Censorship in Renaissance England

The Fate of Edmund Spenser

Authors

  • Andrew Hadfield University of Sussex

Abstract

Using the example of Edmund Spenser, a writer who was frequently in danger of having his work censored, this article argues that analysis of Elizabethan censorship in recent times has often been misdirected. Scholars have argued about the behaviour of the authorities and whether what they decided to allow into print was reasonable. As a study of Spenser's work indicates there may well have been a desire to censor more texts more heavily, but there was no apparatus available to enforce such a policy. Only when texts drew attention to themselves, often when causing a particular incident, was the punitive mechanism of the law employed.

Author Biography

  • Andrew Hadfield , University of Sussex

    Andrew Hadfield (1962) is Professor of English at the University of Sussex, having previously worked at the universities of Leeds and Aberystwyth and as a visiting professor at Columbia University, New York. He works on a number of areas, mainly concerned with the relationship between literature, politics and other cultural contexts, and is the author of many works on early modern literature, including Shakespeare and Republicanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005); Literature, Travel and Colonialism in the English Renaissance, 1540-1625 (Oxford University Press, 1998); and Literature, Politics and National Identity: Reformation to Renaissance (Cambridge, 1994). He is also editor of Renaissance Studies and a regular reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement. He is about to start work on a biography of Edmund Spenser.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Issue

Section

Main Section

How to Cite

Hadfield , A. (2026). Censorship in Renaissance England: The Fate of Edmund Spenser. FRAME, Journal of Literary Studies, 21(2), 44-60. https://platform.openjournals.nl/FRAME/article/view/27491