Tropes in Distention

Cleanth Brooks and the Rise of 'Paradox' in Postwar America

Authors

  • Joost Burgers Utrecht University

Abstract

In this article Burgers addresses the rather curious institutionalization of the American literary critical movement the New Criticism. The curiosity being that the New Critics developed the meat and bones of their critical doctrine before the Second World War, but only received wide-spread attention after the war. Of course, taking into account other factors, what he argues here is that the New Criticism gained such currency because its context of reception changed. The key terms of their critical doctrine, paradox, irony, etc., seemed too narrow and exclusive terms for poetry before the war, but were seen as a general description of life after the war. Thus it is because the New Criticisms critical language shared what Burgers calls a tropological propinquity (really just a fancy way of saying a family resemblance between different key terms or phrases) with the larger discursive patterns in the US after the war that it gained such currency.

Author Biography

  • Joost Burgers, Utrecht University

    After studying Humanities at University College Utrecht, Joost Burgers pursued a Master's degree in Literary Studies at Utrecht University, which he completed successfully in 2005. He will be extending his short-lived academic career in New York, where he will start a PhD in Literary Studies this coming fall at City University New York.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Issue

Section

Main Section

How to Cite

Burgers, J. (2026). Tropes in Distention: Cleanth Brooks and the Rise of ’Paradox’ in Postwar America. FRAME, Journal of Literary Studies, 19(1), 18-35. https://platform.openjournals.nl/FRAME/article/view/27523